keyXI Consulting
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Strategy
    • Organizational Design
    • Management Development
    • Workshop Design
  • Blog
  • Contact
Search

Performance management: The mistakes, and how to avoid them

Posted by Daniel Rose - July 14, 2010 - Blog

The con­cept of per­for­mance man­age­ment isn’t new. The vast major­ity of organ­i­sa­tions have some form of per­for­mance man­age­ment in place. In most cases, this relies on line and mid­dle man­agers to take steps to improve employee per­for­mance. Although this is where many organ­i­sa­tions run into trou­ble, with care­ful thought costly mis­takes can be avoided.

Over-reaction: the enemy of per­for­mance management

One of the worst things that a man­ager can do to improve per­for­mance is to over-react. When peo­ple over-react, it is often dif­fi­cult to retain an unbi­ased and objec­tive opin­ion. This leads to the accen­tu­a­tion of fac­tors that do not really con­tribute to per­for­mance, and allows crit­i­cal fac­tors to be ignored. It is extremely impor­tant to remain fair and con­sis­tent, devel­op­ing a clear pic­ture of what has con­tributed to performance.

Per­son­al­ity or performance

Many man­agers have dif­fi­culty dis­tin­guish­ing poor per­for­mance from per­son­al­ity con­flicts. While it may appear as though per­for­mance is dwin­dling, this can often be per­cep­tion on the man­agers behalf. To a cer­tain extent work­force diver­sity can con­tribute to such per­cep­tions. Cul­ture dif­fer­ences can lead to dif­fer­ing opin­ions on how work should be per­formed, which leads man­agers to ques­tion per­for­mance. In such cir­cum­stances it is often help­ful to obtain a third party opin­ion, or per­haps man­age the per­for­mance process for that employee.

Poor Objec­tives, Poor Performance

If your per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem relies on objec­tives that are vague, unachiev­able, or not applic­a­ble at the front-line, man­ag­ing per­for­mance will be dif­fi­cult. Objec­tives for per­for­mance man­age­ment need to be clearly acheiv­able in a short time frame. This enables poor per­for­mance to be iden­ti­fied faster and with more pre­ci­sion. The ear­lier per­for­mance issues are iden­ti­fied, the eas­ier they are to address.

Time is of the Essence

With mean­ing­ful objec­tives in place, it’s not dif­fi­cult to iden­tify poor per­for­mance. How­ever, once it is iden­ti­fied, it must be addressed as soon as pos­si­ble. Bring up the per­for­mance issue with the employee con­cerned as soon as prac­ti­ca­ble, remem­ber­ing to fol­low your organ­i­sa­tions processes. Set key mile­stones to mon­i­tor the per­for­mance back to an appro­pri­ate level. In some cir­cum­stances it is appro­pri­ate to have staff mon­i­tor their own per­for­mance, but an over­all watch needs to be kept.

Human resource management, Management, Performance management

17 comments on “Performance management: The mistakes, and how to avoid them”

  1. fishing organizations says:
    July 15, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    Thanks for these great tips and point­ers. I know that every­thing I can gain on this topic will go towards mak­ing me a bet­ter manager.

    You site really offers a lot of qual­ity info, keep up the great work.

  2. forex free signals says:
    July 16, 2010 at 3:13 am

    With mean­ing­ful objec­tives in place, it’s not dif­fi­cult to iden­tify poor perÂformance

    that you had meen?
    pos­si­ble more detailed post?

    • Daniel Rose says:
      July 16, 2010 at 1:57 pm

      Thank you for your com­ment. If you find that topic inter­est­ing, I can def­i­nitely do a more in depth arti­cle around objec­tives, goals and the link with excep­tional per­for­mance.
      Daniel

  3. Florin says:
    July 16, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Hmm infor­ma­tive arti­cle. I come again later to read more post.

  4. philippine forum says:
    July 16, 2010 at 2:26 pm

    Another equally impor­tant fac­tor in boost­ing per­for­mance in the work­place is to per­mit peo­ple to think, to allow them to agree and dis­agree even to the point of get­ting per­sonal so long as dis­cus­sions are left in the office. The point is peo­ple must be allowed to be cre­ative and free enough to explore new possibilities.

    • Daniel Rose says:
      July 16, 2010 at 3:07 pm

      Very true.
      Daniel

  5. Salon Marketing Strategy says:
    July 17, 2010 at 7:57 am

    What do you think of col­lab­o­rat­ing with the employee on objec­tives and giv­ing them a sense of own­er­ship towards their per­for­mance requirements?

    • Daniel Rose says:
      July 17, 2010 at 10:26 am

      I think it is an excel­lent idea! I’m in the process of writ­ing a more in depth arti­cle on objec­tives and the rela­tion­ship with per­for­mance, I’ll try to include some detail on man­age­ment by objec­tives and other ways of build­ing employee buy-in to objec­tive set­tings. In short, it’s only fool­ish to exclude the peo­ple who know vol­umes about your busi­ness from build­ing mean­in­ful objec­tives for it…
      Thanks for your comment!

  6. Escorts Calgary says:
    July 17, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    I think the best way to max­i­mize employ­ees poten­tials that would lead to bet­ter work per­for­mance is through moti­va­tion and let­ting them explore new pos­si­bil­i­ties. Trust is also another equally impor­tant factor.Great arti­cle, very informative.Keep it up!

  7. IQ Test says:
    July 17, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    This is such a good arti­cle. I agree that as a man­ager you really should have a wider per­spec­tive on things espe­cially in deal­ing with your peo­ple so you could bring out the best in them to let them per­form at their best. One should also have a heart to feel his employee’s sen­ti­ments towards work.

  8. Exhibition Banner Stands says:
    July 23, 2010 at 3:20 am

    Per­for­mance man­age­ment is all about build­ing up trust­ing rela­tion­ships and moti­vat­ing your staff.

  9. Wills says:
    July 25, 2010 at 11:35 pm

    I agree with your idea of get­ting a third party opin­ion when assess­ing per­for­mance, it’s all too easy to let per­sonal assump­tions and sen­ti­ment affect your judgment.

  10. NoFa says:
    July 27, 2010 at 5:59 am

    I think that you make many valid points here. All in all good man­agers pro­duce good employ­ees; if employ­ees enjoy work­ing for their supe­ri­ors and respect their supe­ri­ors because they feel respected and val­ued as well, they are more likely to be moti­vated to per­form at a higher level. I think that quite often man­agers iden­tify poor per­for­mance and instead of try­ing to rem­edy the sit­u­a­tion they view their employee as replace­able. I think it is impor­tant for man­age­ment to set ground rules and expec­ta­tions early on and to fol­low through with those but to also be open to dif­fer­ent per­son­al­i­ties and respect and value diver­sity in the work­place as a pos­i­tive trait ver­sus a neg­a­tive (within the right context/boundaries).

  11. Roger Allied Time says:
    July 27, 2010 at 6:55 am

    It is also very impor­tant to know the dif­fer­ence between man­ag­ing and micro­manag­ing. When employ­ees are being micro­man­age it can make them feel like they are not being trusted with their work and can cre­ate frus­tra­tion. Great post Daniel!

    • Daniel Rose says:
      July 27, 2010 at 8:48 am

      Thanks for your response Roger!
      Daniel

  12. Bulk Solid says:
    September 23, 2010 at 6:24 pm

    In a busi­ness, it’s really impor­tant for a man­ager to be aware of the per­for­mance man­age­ment to max­i­mize the work­ing poten­tial of his employee which would lead to bet­ter and pro­duc­tive result.Ignorance of this may result to low busi­ness pro­duc­tiv­ity. Very infor­ma­tive post, thanks for sharing.

  13. Bulk Powder says:
    October 12, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    Per­for­mance man­age­ment is very essen­tial in employer-employee rela­tion­ship for a fact that good work­ing envi­ron­ment in a com­pany leads to bet­ter work per­for­mance of the employee. This will of course result to bet­ter busi­ness pro­duc­tiv­ity. Man­agers should really be aware of this to avoid any prob­lems in the future. Any­way, thanks a lot for shar­ing your thoughts. Keep it up!

Contact Us

  • info@keyXI.com
  • Contact Us

Latest Tweets

  • Top Ten Posts of 2011 http://t.co/Eu6Rw5cS
    February 5, 2012 - 10:23 pm
  • The Mission Makes the Team. http://t.co/Wj0xv63I
    February 5, 2012 - 8:29 pm
  • Planning to fail http://t.co/fBfh7OE7
    February 1, 2012 - 6:12 pm

Client results

The service and personal attention we received from Mr. Rose was exceptional and he has a good depth of knowledge in his field.— Name withheld, 150 room hotel based in Madinah, Saudi Arabia.

Daniel Rose was simply excellent in all regards. I would heartily recommend him to anyone.— Paul Marriott, Marriott Organization, Inc.

I had a very good experience working with Daniel Rose as he put together a profit sharing structure for our company. He quoted a fair price and the work that he did far exceeded my expectations. He also was great in following up and spending time to make sure I understood what he had put together. I definitely recommend him to others!— Marc Cabianca, Bridge Learning

Recent Blog Posts

  • Blame it on Accountability
  • Top Ten Posts of 2011
  • The Mission Makes the Team.
  • Designing Organisations — People or Tasks?
  • Social Media and Coca-Cola
© 2012 keyXI Consulting. Copyright & Trademark Notice